[throwaway_nyt]

You have very conveniently sweept it under normal PR behavior. And even used NYtimes link to debunk it all. Lovely. Nytimes pandered Iraq war hard to US masses, never believing in any political position they push.

https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak...

Nytimes sending out first draft to John Podesta:- https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/844

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213#efmDVTDWd Mark Leibovich giving veto power on a clinton piece.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7524#efmA9fBAI

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9416#efmATHAXN

I have left out all the normal questions which journalists ask.

Donna Brazile leaking CNN questions:- https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/57027

DNC directing questions to Wolf Blitzer to ask to Donald/Cruz/Fiorina:- https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/25846 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/25284 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/23570 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/23554

NBC news first draft:- https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/26390

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/42191 (Don't know what he/she is talking about here)

Newsweek story:- https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/41392

DNC Chairman having meeting with MSNBC predisent:- https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8867

Sharing story before sharing with editor:- https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808

Jake Tapper questions:- https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4077

Journalists have been giving the campaign full stories before being published, will Clinton team not push back on any negative aspects?

There are 2 3 other emails; one from a batch released a month ago and one around last week. Form your own opinions if they are journalists asking for a genuine access, or...

Sorry for bad formatting...

[_fizz_buzz_]

> Nytimes sending out first draft to John Podesta:- https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/844

Stopped reading there. This is why we need journalism. People like you are unable to interpret the content of these emails. He is subscribed to the NYtimes First Draft blog [1]. Everyone with an NYTimes subscription can get the newsletter. As you can also tell by the sender [e-mail] [2]This isn't an actual first draft. Stop spreading misinformation and take your bs back to reddit.

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/08/21/today...

[2] http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/faq/aboutsiteqa17.ht...

[throwaway_nyt]

Good thing, atleast you read this one before ignoring:- https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak...

Don't give me your attitude. I got one wrong and admit the mistake on that one. That does not really refute any other emails.

[croon]

> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213#efmDVTDWd Mark Leibovich giving veto power on a clinton piece.

You got the second one wrong as well, so I stopped there instead. He was giving veto on what to use on off-the-record questions, which I hope you agree, is a very good practice.

Someone else can deal with your third, and fourth...

But if you want apples to apples, it's unfortunate that you can't dig through Trumps emails [1].

It's sad that politics is no longer about politics.

[1] http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-...

[_fizz_buzz_]

> Don't give me your attitude.

You are right. I apologize for the dismissive tone of my comment.

[Angostura]

The trouble is, when you get the first one wrong, it doesn't encourage people to take the time to read the rest.