Or, I don't agree with this absurd definition of privacy that the tech sector has gotten itself enamored with, but okay, we'll go with the accusations of being a shill.
It doesn't matter if you are a shill or are doing it because you believe you're right. At the end of the day you and other people that agree with such abuses for some subtle reason are all part of the problem. Hence playing for the opposite team.
You don't seem to understand that being reasonable, impartial and giving companies the benefit of doubt doesn't work when you are a mere flea opposing gigantic conglomerates.
Privacy is very simple. The person's data should be controlled by that person: they should know what data is stored on them, should be able to correct it if wrong or ask for it to be deleted.
Any kind of data transmission should be opt-in.
Anything else is bullshit and goes against the interests of the customer. If not at the beginning, when they inevitably decide to monetize that data.
You don't seem to understand that being reasonable, impartial and giving companies the benefit of doubt doesn't work when you are a mere flea opposing gigantic conglomerates.
Privacy is very simple. The person's data should be controlled by that person: they should know what data is stored on them, should be able to correct it if wrong or ask for it to be deleted. Any kind of data transmission should be opt-in.
Anything else is bullshit and goes against the interests of the customer. If not at the beginning, when they inevitably decide to monetize that data.