[paulddraper]

The "point" is server-side vs client-side templating.

It's easiest to keep everything in one templating system and language. (Note: I said easiest, not most robust or ideal.)

Options:

1. Isomorphic code. This requires either NodeJS or compile-to-JS tooling.

2. Client-side-only: bad for SEO and usability.

3. Server-side-only: You either write several lives of boilerplate every time line your example, or use intercooler and write a single-liner.

[throwawayReply]

What's wrong with "boilerplate with code-generator"?

For smaller sites, the number of parts often isn't huge, so boilerplate isn't a big deal.

[paulddraper]

I probably don't understand what you mean.

Generating code in a Turing-complete language use a program written in another Turing-complete language can get messy.

[throwawayReply]

I mean scaffolding.

Just because something is turing complete doesn't mean that a generator has to be able to generate anything possible.

If boilerplate is an issue, scaffolding / code generators can be a quick fix.

[paulddraper]

Can I have intercooler do that scaffolding for me?