|
|
|
|
|
by hx87
3512 days ago
|
|
> if a model is too complex for humans to reason about, then a business could encode any kind of illicit behavior in the form of model parameters they like If a model is too complex for humans to reason about, how would a business encode illicit behavior, unless the AI itself was running a significant portion of the business? Even in that case, someone or some group is responsible for setting the initial parameters of the model, and they can be held responsible for its decisions. In the end, I think the legal solution would be put less emphasis on mens rea and more on actus reus. In other words, if your AI does something wrong, you are in the wrong, regardless of your intentions. |
|
But that would be a large change in the way the legal system works. Fewer people than you'd expect understand that today, a large portion of crimes, if not most crimes, require both intentions and action for the legal system to judge guilt.
"A fundamental principle of Criminal Law is that a crime consists of both a mental and a physical element. Mens rea, a person's awareness of the fact that his or her conduct is criminal, is the mental element, and actus reus, the act itself, is the physical element."
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/mens+rea