* did you even read what you linked ? it is arguing semantics:
>If they would say that smoking increases the incidence of
>lung cancer or that smoking is a risk factor in the
>development of lung cancer, then I would agree. The
>purpose of this article is to emphasize the need to use
>language appropriately in both the medical and scientific
>literature (the media, as a whole, may be a lost cause).
* it was published in 1999
* in a very sketchy journal
* did you even read what you linked ? it is arguing semantics: