[ysh7]

A similar project[1] which is also open source[2] and looks a lot similar.

[1] https://shipyard-project.com/

[2] https://github.com/shipyard/shipyard

[deviantony]

Hey there ! We have a comparison table on our website: http://portainer.io/portainer-comparison.html

The main advantage against shipyard is that you only need to deploy one container to run Portainer, it's really simple and quick. Shipyard deployment is more complex.

[ysh7]

That comparison looks inaccurate. Shipyard does support tagging images. Also will support Swarm [1] mode (and volume/ network support)

[1] https://github.com/shipyard/shipyard/pull/837

[deviantony]

Thanks, I will update the comparison table. I did not include 'next' features in the table :)

[hultner]

Have you ever thought about adding support for kvm/QEMU/virsh-based virtual machines as well? I've been looking for a easy to use interface that gives a comprehensive overview of virtual machines as well as containers as I'm often using a mix of both.

[ncresswell]

At the moment, we are focussed purely on docker containers... Our mantra, focus on one thing and do that one thing better than anyone else

[Matthias247]

Cockpit [1] too, although that might be a bit more focused on single machine management than on clusters (don't use any of those - so I can't tell for sure)

[1] http://cockpit-project.org/

[SeriousM]

Well, it seems to cover the same functionality! But there is no windows support and does run in the shell instead of a docker image.