[teejayvanslyke]

Thanks for the comment! I think my main point here was that buying a house isn't necessarily a good investment, depending on your goals and the price of the house relative to its value.

I will say though, that it makes sense for owners to defend their position, since they're already owners. And, as a renter, I'm likely to do the same.

Regardless, I appreciate both perspectives!

[johnwheeler]

It's really strange that, ever since the financial crisis, 20-30 somethings are starting to rationalize rent over ownership. It's a counterproductive argument that hinges on interest rates quickly shooting back up to 7-8% so housing prices go back down. There are a lot of forces moving against that though. Asset holders (homes and stock) aren't so keen on giving up the new values they've become accustom to, and Europe has negative rates. When Ben Bernake left the Fed, he started giving these 250K dinners to Wall Street. The crux of his message was low interest rates are here to stay.

http://www.businessinsider.com/r-at-big-ticket-dinners-a-blu...

And, even if interest rates do rise dramatically over the next 10-20 years, inflation will act as a counterweight against the argument of buying now.

Instead of rationalizing rent, I think you'd do better to downsize and try to get a house you can afford. That way you have a strong asset you can work with if your $150,000 in 401K money doesn't amount to squat in your 70s.

Not trying to be a jerk, but America has been sold a lie with the 401K (watch "The Retirement Gamble" on PBS), There's going to be a major crisis in 30 years. In my view, there's no real answer other than trying to amass a shit ton of assets and hoping technology relieves some of the burden rather than compounding it. Ok, now I'm getting off topic... :-)

Anyway, yours is a smart piece, and I'm sure you'll do fine.