Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fulafel 3518 days ago
So that's linking to a Forbes article that's paraphrasing this study from 2012: https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~tdumitra/public_documents/bilge12...

It doesn't support your assertion but it's still interesting 2008-2010 data from an antivirus vendor. It's talking about about how long some vulnerabilities were exploited by malware before getting disclosed, use in targeted attacks, and so on.

1 comments

The study says that most vulnerabilities were being exploited before being disclosed.
I don't think it says that about the set of all vulnerabilities (IOW - citation needed!).

It does say "In this paper, we consider only exploits that have been used in real-world attacks before the corresponding vulnerabilities were disclosed" so it's unsurprising that in their dataset this is the case :)

Yeap, you're right, I misread. Here is a quote from the paper: "15% of these exploits were created before the disclosure of the corresponding vulnerability." So there's a lower bound.