Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by piotrjurkiewicz 3522 days ago
An email from Google's chairman to Clinton Campaign (I selected the most technical parts, which I believe will be most interesting to HN crowd, link to full email at the bottom):

---

Here are some comments and observations based on what we saw in the 2012 campaign. If we get started soon, we will be in a very strong position to execute well for 2016.

---

Key is the development of a single record for a voter that aggregates all that is known about them.

---

For each voter, a score is computed ranking probability of the right vote. Analytics can model demographics, social factors and many other attributes of the needed voters. Modeling will tell us what who we need to turn out and why, and studies of effectiveness will let us know what approaches work well. Machine intelligence across the data should identify the most important factors for turnout, and preference.

It should be possible to link the voter records in Van with upcoming databases from companies like Comcast and others for media measurement purposes.

---

Quite a bit of software is to be developed to match digital identities with the actual voter file with high confidence. The key unit of the campaign is a "voter", and each and every record is viewable and updatable by volunteers in search of more accurate information.

In the case where we can't identify the specific human, we can still have a partial digital voter id, for a person or "probable-person" with attributes that we can identify and use to target. As they respond we can eventually match to a registered voter in the main file. This digital key is eventually matched to a real person.

---

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262#efmAC9AE0...

1 comments

That's a nice find. It's worth skimming the full email for context. He's laying out the draft organizational plain for a modern campaign and it's about what you'd expect. The only interesting part is that it's actually public and, to me, how non-conspiratorial these emails have been. Clearly some people take a different view.
Can't read the email itself, but these excerpts almost seem to imply that they'd be using Google's data in order to construct this? Is this an incorrect read? Or is he just outlining how to build such a system in the abstract?
No - in the e-mail itself, he mentions that there's a mobile app field volunteers could use to update information on the voter in real-time, as they go door-to-door and canvas. Presumably it also hooks into poll databases, telephone surveys, previous voter rolls, and other data sources.
The latter. He mentions buying data from the standard marketing sources and hosting systems on AWS.