|
|
|
|
|
by deno
3514 days ago
|
|
> If the offload factor is sufficiently small there is no rational reason to burn battery on it. Sure, but there’s also no cost to it, if you go with the piggyback/opportunistic approach. That’s the point. It’s either net positive or just neutral. Whether the local offload is effective or not— that’s a different argument. Anyway, the driving reason for my interest in IPFS is re-decentralization of the Web. If it can, theoretically, save some data on mobile—so much better. What it needs, though, is simply work on mobile at least as well as HTTP. There’s no doubt IPFS has no fundamental architectural problems in that regard. Though, full disclosure, it does have some major implementation issues at the moment. |
|