>I've seen the opposite in recent respectable economics textbooks.
I bet it wasn't Greg "the rich can do no wrong" Mankiw's textbook ;)
>In any case, a thought experiment: the 99% should get a $99/hour minimum, don't you think?
What's the thought experiment designed to achieve?
Hiking to $99 / hour immediately would likely trigger a bout of extremely high inflation - likely to a level which would hamper growth (as people would be more scrambling to protect their wealth rather than spending their money on useful products and services).
Personally, I'd hike to $20 and then put the wage up by $1 / hr every three months until inflation hit ~10% (~12-15% is the point at which inflation starts hampering growth) and from then on target that level of inflation via the minimum wage and welfare payments.
That would drive a huge amount of economic growth (spending would jump) and bring down inequality to more manageable levels.
I bet it wasn't Greg "the rich can do no wrong" Mankiw's textbook ;)
>In any case, a thought experiment: the 99% should get a $99/hour minimum, don't you think?
What's the thought experiment designed to achieve?
Hiking to $99 / hour immediately would likely trigger a bout of extremely high inflation - likely to a level which would hamper growth (as people would be more scrambling to protect their wealth rather than spending their money on useful products and services).
Personally, I'd hike to $20 and then put the wage up by $1 / hr every three months until inflation hit ~10% (~12-15% is the point at which inflation starts hampering growth) and from then on target that level of inflation via the minimum wage and welfare payments.
That would drive a huge amount of economic growth (spending would jump) and bring down inequality to more manageable levels.