|
|
|
|
|
by OrpheanBeholder
3521 days ago
|
|
> Is this the one that forked off BitCoin due to differences centered around how it didn't make its investors/founders enough money You must be thinking of something else. Matthew Green has said he would have much rather got this implemented in BitCoin. ZCash forked off of BitCoin because BitCoin core wouldn't accept it. The proposed solution was a "side chain" to BitCoin. Side chains have been being talked about since around 2009, and that's all that is happened: talking. There is no code and no agreement on how they should work. The fork happened when it became apparent that this would never make it into Bitcoin in any form. |
|
Matthew Green was _insistent_ about making an altcoin. I believe can substantiate this with DKIM-signed emails by Google, if it's actually being refuted. He was especially concerned about difficulties monetizing any other path.
In particular, later I begged for access to the efficient SHA256 circuits which had been created and benchmarked as part of their publications, which were held back from publication with libsnark. ... so that I could begin working on applications of them with Bitcoin, only to be blown off.
> and that's all that is happened: talking. There is no code and
https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements sidechain right here.