|
|
|
|
|
by dave_sullivan
3522 days ago
|
|
> Also I think the term we should actually be using is "Natural Selection" rather than "Evolution" in this case. Nope, I'm using it in the "evolutionary algorithm", "evolution as mathematical optimization" sense. > It is an optimizer for breeding and nothing more. I really disagree there. Humans did not evolve in a vacuum; their are a ton of systems and subsystems that evolved across different species leading up to humans. I don't have time to write an essay, but I think you're vastly oversimplifying evolution in pursuit of a binary function. It's just not that simple, and neither is how food interacts with our body. |
|
As far as your disagreement goes... Perhaps "breeding" wasn't the 100% accurate thing to say, but natural selection is the process that decides what genes to pass to the next generation causing evolution... if you really disagree with that you are not disagreeing with me personally, you are disagreeing with over 200 yrs of science spanning many fields.