|
|
|
|
|
|
by taeric
3528 days ago
|
|
|
I did find that most all of my questions were directly addressed in the paper on a slow read. I should have picked up on them in a fast read. Your second paragraph seems to hit it on the head, though. Since most of my exposure was to scheme and racket, I have not looked deeply at Lisp2s. However, having switched to emacs and written some elisp, I have yet to really be annoyed by the fact that it is a Lisp2. |
|
|