Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
I am not a fanboy.
16 points by anotherone 5906 days ago
I own an iPhone, an iPad, and a Macbook. I read Daring Fireball, TUAW and Macrumors. I believe that Apple's hardware is superior to all others in the market. People like to call out how I'm always "tuned in" to Apple news.

But I am not a fanboy.

I don't think the Operating system is the best. It is fraught with inconsistencies underneath its friendly veneer. There is a reason why Windows is popular and it may have something to do with usability. I use OS X because it is simply the best Unix desktop out there.

The iTunes application is a beacon of monolithic programming. It reeks of legacy-oriented design, completely contradictory to Apple's touted design mantra. Yet it exists unaltered, version after version solely because of the revenue it generates. Design and Engineering be damned, we're making money here. I use it because they threatened and killed every other music player for the Mac. I have never bought an iTunes song.

I unlocked my iPhone within the first 2 hours of owning it. I paid for my hardware, not the AT&T tithing. I am completely happy with my 50$ a month, fully functional smartphone.

I run a jailbroken phone despite the security risks. The app store is a breeding ground of corporate adware and get-rich-quick wannabes. The only thing it doesn't contain is what Mac developers were renowned for -- small, independent and creative paid software. Some innovations found in Cydia deserve more attention that they get today.

I bought an iPad because it was the cheapest and best way to acquire a manifestation of things Xerox invented 20+ years ago, and what Microsoft has been researching for 10+ years. And I am impressed with what I see.

Overall, you're still the best products money can buy for what I want to do.

I respect Apple because it has the best engineering in the world. It takes a spectrum of well understood technology, and creates the best possible device in that category. Every other part of Apple: its lawyers, its strategists, its leaders and its marketing do not matter.

I am aware that the new Apple, Inc. caters to exactly two kinds of people. The busy soccer mom with a 6 figure family income, and the rabid nerd who chants Objective-C while worshipping at his local Steve Jobs altar.

This is not a rant. It is simply a statement that Apple has more these 2 kinds of customers. The third kind is me -- the tinkerer, the hacker, the fan of good technology. The kind that rejects rules, limitations and playgrounds of corporate malfeasance.

I am the one who Thinks Different.

3 comments

I don't think you'll be their customer much longer.

You could have been describing me. I got on the Mac bandwagon 10 years ago, when Mac OS X didn't work properly yet, and just recently got off.

Ubuntu is a better Unix desktop now. I laugh at the Ubuntu community arguing about their sleek new icons in the top bar. They're not quite consistent, use slightly different shades, some legacy ones are a different height from the rest. I remember reading the exact same arguments about the Mac OS X ones yet even the Linux guys assume the Mac is infallible in this regard. Any reader of Gruber should know otherwise.

There's pros and cons and everyone has their own use case but Ubuntu is gaining them, and the Mac is losing them as far as I can see (e.g. it seems like Ubunutu works better with iPods these days, crazy as that sounds, just by not implementing anti-features that stop you doing things like copying your music off). You know Ubuntu is going ship three upgrades in the next 18 months, whereas news has just come out that Apple has reduced the 10.7 team to a skeleton crew (which has happened repeatedly to other interesting projects within Apple) which means even its optimistic release date of 18 months is in doubt, as is how much they'll charge you for the upgrade.

I bought iPods because they were perfect for me and Apple were years ahead of the curve. They're not any more. I nearly bought an Apple TV, but if your life doesn't revolve around iTunes it doesn't make sense. I bought the iPhone, a bit more reluctantly, if I was going to carry a phone anyway, I might as well have one with a great browser, and they were a couple of years ahead of the competition. They're not anymore. I'm not going to bother with the iPad (or anything else Apple again) because they're not that far ahead of the competition and they won't be for long.

I don't need a pad, I want the same low-power ARM hardware plus a keyboard in a standard netbook form factor running Linux. If it's not got access to the "Apt" store, then I'm not interested.

Ubuntu will never get traction on desktop until video drivers at least show image on monitors. I've spent 3 days trying to install correct drivers for my graphic card, until I've finally gave up.
I was talking about myself, the poster, and geeks in general rather than "the desktop" market. You'll notice I was using Mac OS X when it wasn't ready for the desktop either (and you could argue it never was if you look at global marketshare numbers). Drivers for hardware was their big issue too, something Linux still beats them for today if you compare the difficulty of building a hackintosh to building a Linux box.

However, if you can't even get an image to show with Ubuntu then you're doing something very wrong. Not taking advantage of all the features of the card without installing proprietary drivers (offered, but not forced on you, with a single click in Ubuntu), yes that's common. Not being able to view anything with a recent Ubuntu on a desktop machine is a very unusual situation.

On the other hand, what if I told you to use supported hardware? The same way you have to buy supported hardware for OS X.
Ironically, Mac hardware has pretty impressive Linux support. Aside from some (admittedly very frustrating) touchpad issues, I have had great success with sleep, hibernate, wifi (once I replaced that trash nm-applet with wicd), nvidia, etc.
Fair play. Though you are financially supporting the anti-tinkering apple, you're telling apple (with your dollars) that closed is the way to go. Be careful how that turns out.
Well, you are doing nothing to dissuade the apple haters that stereotype mac people as smug, conceited hipsters.
You're entitled to your opinion, but how is this smug or conceited? I'd like to disagree. My viewpoint is very humble; I am not judging anybody or making snide comments.

The first half of what I wrote explains how I am a customer despite acknowledging its flaws, because in the end, it is superior engineering. How is this smug?

I am only critical of Apple's rare but poor engineering decisions. Everything else, as I say in my text, does not matter. And I think I am fairly objective about this. How is this conceited?

If the last few lines of what I wrote seemed out of place, here is the context: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USn5t5nQWU8&NR=1 . This ad, along with other Apple ads, clearly paints the picture of Apple Computer's target demographic. This is the Apple I identify with -- a motley crew of "hipsters", in your words. Yet, this is the Apple that doesn't exist anymore. Which is what I am sad about. It is frustrating sometimes to feel abandoned like this, yet I know there are others like me. Hence I wrote this.

If this piece came across as smug, conceited or hipster-like , I apologize for the clarity in my writing.