[treehau5_]

Putting aside what s ridiculous, downright asinine comparison that was in comparison with our economy now -- what an extremely cold, unempathetic comment. People, lots of people, with families are going to lose their livelihood. Many are advanced in age, and have only known one thing their whole life. We have a responsibility to our fellow neighbor. A 50 year old truck driver is not going to pick up a coding boot camp and get hired as a tech worker, maybe a small handful but it's unrealistic.

[dotancohen]

  > Putting aside what s ridiculous, downright asinine
  > comparison that was in comparison with our economy now
  > what an extremely  cold, unempathetic comment.

You should read about the introduction of machines in 18th century England if you think that comparison is ridiculous, asinine or unsympathetic. Start with the Flying Shuttle and the Spinning Jenny.

Hint: there was no social security or unemployment benefits then.

[wastedhours]

As has been mentioned elsewhere - there were other un/low skilled industries that people could move sideways into once they'd been displaced. Automation affected vertical industries in previous "revolutions", whereas now automation is impacting a vast swathe of un/low skilled industries simultaneously.

[madaxe_again]

And do you know how many starved, and how incredibly abysmal the conditions were for workers? Quality of living for the majority of people took a nosedive with the industrial revolution, and the pay-off took generations.

Yes, they had gas street lighting and coal fires, but they no longer had the freedom they'd enjoyed since the end of feudalism, and once more found themselves serfs - just this time ten to a room in disease ridden urban slums rather than in their peasants cottage in whatever village they'd been sucked up from.

Yeah, we're still here, but to assert that everything was positive is equally ridiculous. It took over a century for labour rights to start appearing, and for the system of governance to adapt to economic reality. Do you really want the same again?

[jellicle]

You're getting downvoted because the readers of HN do not get old or have neighbors.

[madaxe_again]

HN is a libertarian technocratic bubble. If technology isn't the solution, or if technology might present a social problem, they don't want to know.

[losteverything]

Yes. HN gives access to minds and lives unseen.

Sometimes a downvote is really an upvote because it confirms the distance at hand