|
|
|
|
|
|
by duskwuff
3527 days ago
|
|
|
Right, of course. I just don't see any reason that there would be an especially high "multiplier" on this vulnerability. A spurious SSL warning doesn't require the server to do anything particularly expensive; it just requires it to look at the ID, realize it's something weird that it doesn't recognize, and move on. |
|
|