|
|
|
|
|
by robryk
3530 days ago
|
|
Right now, to keep a poisoned entry one must keep poisoning the cache. In that world, one can still do that. One can also poison the entry once and then deny access to the real server. You seem to be arguing that this is easier than continuous poisoning. Do I understand you correctly? |
|
I am in no way arguing about ease of any given attack over any other. I am arguing that a proposed change results in an increased level of danger from known attacks.
I'm arguing that the proposed change at hand, keeping DNS records past their TTLs, makes DNS poisoning attacks more dangerous because access to origin servers can be denied. Right now TTLs are a real defense against DNS cache poisoning, and the idea at hand removes that in the name of user-friendliness.