|
|
|
|
|
by ericdykstra
3523 days ago
|
|
Of course everything has risks, but I'm just advocating not taking risks with extreme downside when the positive upside is small. Eating is necessary for life, but taking a pill to reduce the risk of acid-reflux symptoms is not. > _Medications have a particularly strong impact, but are also highly controlled. You can judge the probability of various outcomes very well, which makes it a lot easier to come to a clear conclusion about using them or not._ This is the main point where we disagree. You say medications are controlled, but I see alarming numbers of recalls of drugs [1]. Controlled studies only show a small part of the picture of the long-term impact of a particular drugs' use. > And I'm going to assume you didn't intend to say that merely going to the doctor should be avoided except in life-threatening circumstances. All I'm saying is that going to the doctor has risks that need to be considered. And when a doctor recommends some treatment, ask what he would do if he was in your situation, or what recommendation she would give to her brother. 1. http://www.raps.org/Regulatory-Focus/News/2014/08/11/20005/N... |
|
Medications absolutely are controlled. That doesn't mean they don't have issues, but are you willing to suggest medications are less controlled than food? I don't need to hope I've washed my medications well enough, nor do I need to ensure I've heated them to at least a certain temperature for a length of time, nor do I need to worry about cross contamination or any such thing. This isn't to say medications are without risk, but compared to produce, meat, or eggs I have a much better idea about what exactly is entering my body when I consume it.
>All I'm saying is that going to the doctor has risks that need to be considered.
I doubt that very much. Are the risks significantly greater than the risk you likely took getting to the doctor in the first place? I'd be shocked.