Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lukasm 3530 days ago
P0rn is illegal in many countries. Facebook wants to do business in these countries, hence aggressive filtering and minimum liability.
2 comments

Does Facebook have a representation in those countries?

Besides that, we're not talking about porn. Unless you want to see breast cancer videos and mothers feeding their children as porn but that would be a perception error, the label simply does not apply.

Facebook has offices in Dubai, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Singapore. These restrict internet pornography by law; even though much of actual Internet traffic may still be porn, businesses do not wish to associate with it because porn could provide a too convenient legal handle to prosecute representatives or shut down services as a retaliation for publishing things that are e.g. critical of the local government.

Of course we are not talking about porn, but drawing lines in the sand is a murky business.

So there's breast cancer, there's breast feeding, and everything else is porn?

That can't be right.

Women leaving their faces uncovered is illegal in many countries. This should have zero bearing on what I can do in my own country.
> Women leaving their faces uncovered is illegal in many countries.

Which countries?

As far as I know, only Afghanistan during the period of Taliban rule, and Daesh until they decided it was a security risk.

So: none.

It's not "should"; that's how it is.

Facebook isn't your country.

It's also 'illegal' for women to have their faces covered in some countries.

Does this mean that there should be no pictures of women on Facebook?

It's upto Facebook what they want to do.
Really? Where?
Burkas, burkinis in France. (It's a bit more complicated then that, hence the scare quotes.)

Depending on who you ask, it's either because of some hand-waved nonsense about public safety, or because liberal Western values include telling women what they can and cannot wear.