|
|
|
|
|
by samjewell
3525 days ago
|
|
Thanks for the comments - they're already very useful. To explain our process:
We have a single designer, and when designs are reviewed it's usually by one of the devs In the past we've done wireframes (Sketch) and interactive prototypes (InVision)
We were frustrated that:
1. Lots of issues didn't surface until we started coding, when a raft of problems/edgecases would appear.
2. It was too easy to ignore existing UI components/css, so that each design featured new component styles and css. For approx the last month our designer branches from `master` and hacks on top of that to create designs. He then creates a PR for design-review, alongside a spec with some screenshots in Dropbox Paper.
Some advantages of this:
1. We get visual diffs from Percy, so we can see what's changed easily
2. We get versioning more easily built into designs (via git) Then just before development we'll break a story down into tasks / subtasks and log those into JIRA for development.
We have trouble with:
1. Letting the designer make changes once the subtasks are created and development has started (devs sometimes chasing a 'moving-target' spec)
2. Design not knowing the current state of development |
|