Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by iotscale 3526 days ago
Or more fine grained permissions.

They could at least make it possible choosing not to upgrade a very simple extension which we may have been personally reviewed.

I want a fixed (read: no updates) extension that does this: On key press, check if the key is backspace, when it is, check if any form element is focused, when not, go back. One line of JS, I guess three with nice formatting. If I create this, I need to submit it to the Chrome Store so Chrome won't complain about untrusted extensions.

Of course they also removed the ability to tell it that I know what I'm doing.

2 comments

I agree but unfortunately it's not a very popular design pattern these days.

Because of this I basically have no applications installed on my android smartphone since even trivial applications often end up requiring ridiculous amounts of privileges (often for relatively minor features) and of course there's no way to fine tune what you allow and what you don't.

Honestly I think that's a terrible habit to give your users, just ignore the privilege list since there's nothing you can do about it and click "sure whatever".

Devs should have to justify why the app needs the feature and I should be able to disable it if it's not critical for the application to work correctly. It would make it a bit harder to write and test those apps but it's not like it's rocket science either...

Sidenote: It is pretty much exactly the Googles (alas, auto-updated) "Go Back With Backspace" [0] does: [1] (you forgot the shift backspace, Google as well in past versions).

[0] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/go-back-with-backs...

[1] https://crx.dam.io/source/crxviewer.html?crx=https://crx.dam... (nice to walk trough history of this file though versions https://crx.dam.io/ext/eekailopagacbcdloonjhbiecobagjci.html )