Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mSparks 3532 days ago
It's not a case of blaming. Its a case of choosing https://www.libressl.org/ or https://www.openssl.org/

Applying best practice development processes or Pretending someone else can do it all for you, and you can "bolt it on" at the end.

The article lists: Future plans and lessons learned: At the top of the list for future development is support for TLS 1.3.

Like adding yet another protocol to the already hacked mess of protocols is a "good" thing.

1 comments

LibreSSL is only better because it does less and much more human attention is wasted on producing bug free C code. That's an improvement but it's quite limited.