[hiringmanager]

Republicans were not opposed to Obama because of his race, though for the past 8 years that has been the excuse to avoid talking about the issues.

And once again, Liberals are not talking about Trumps positions, but merely calling him racist and sexist.

"It seems so fucked up to vote for someone hoping that they're just a pandering amoral liar who won't deliver on their promises."

Well, the charitable view of Hillary supporters is that this is what they are doing. Otherwise, you really think journalists should be taken out by drone for publishing things embarrassing to hillary?

You really think free speech rights should be taken away from people who make a movie critical of hillary? (That's what "Citizens United" was about - the supreme court defended free speech for a group that made a movie critical of hillary-- and since then we've been hearing how evil that ruling is.)

[dpark]

> Republicans were not opposed to Obama because of his race, though for the past 8 years that has been the excuse to avoid talking about the issues.

Sure. The birther movement was about the issues.

> And once again, Liberals are not talking about Trumps positions, but merely calling him racist and sexist.

This is patently untrue. Trumps positions have been widely derided as unconstitutional and poorly thought out. The fact that his racism and sexism are talked about doesn't mean his positions haven't also been widely criticized.

> Well, the charitable view of Hillary supporters is that this is what they are doing. Otherwise, you really think journalists should be taken out by drone for publishing things embarrassing to hillary?

What are you talking about?

> You really think free speech rights should be taken away from people who make a movie critical of hillary? (That's what "Citizens United" was about - the supreme court defended free speech for a group that made a movie critical of hillary-- and since then we've been hearing how evil that ruling is.)

Citizens United was about political ad spending by corporations. It's a mischaracterization to present the case as if it were about Hillary trying to shut down a critical film. It was the FEC trying to enforce the BCRA.

[etjossem]

> Well, the charitable view of Hillary supporters is that this is what they are doing. Otherwise, you really think journalists should be taken out by drone for publishing things embarrassing to hillary?

> What are you talking about?

I think they are trying to make a reference to a previously-unknown conservative blog which claimed they had an anonymous quote from a "State Department source" saying that HRC asked about approving a drone strike on Julian Assange.

The claimed source has not gone to any professional news outlets. The blog has not published anything else of note, and by quick survey of other posts, its author has a clear agenda against HRC. I'll let you all draw your own conclusions.

[jimbokun]

"Republicans were not opposed to Obama because of his race"

Many, maybe most Republicans were not opposed to Obama for that reason.

But the Trump campaign and his supporters have made it clear a non-trivial number of Republicans oppose him for that reason.