|
|
|
|
|
by ta_donk_gt
3526 days ago
|
|
Behavior such as these from CNN: [1] and [2] has been par for the course for the mainstream media as far as I have seen this year. Scare, divert, suppress, collude, whatever it takes to avoid the public getting to the truth if it will hurt their candidate. I just can't understand how this does not scare people. How is this different from the state run media in third-world countries we used to laugh at as kids? It may be working out for your team _this_time_, but the same behavior will almost certainly be used against you in the future. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWKwEBIkYhI
[2] https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205 |
|
In fact, I think they were going on in the 15 years before that as well, though they were less pronounced, less obvious and less extreme. The media has probably always been a bit of a propaganda organ... it's just that the voices were a lot more diverse.
The really alarming thing we've seen this year is Google, Facebook and Reddit starting to use algorithms to suppress some voices and amplify others. Combine that with "Correct The Record" (the army of paid hillary shills who have taken over at least reddit) and the internet is no longer the alternative where you can have a reasonable discussion.
Why participate when your opponent is most likely a hired troll?