[danielahn]

Is this post satirical? I think I am being trolled, but at the risk of making myself look like a fool for falling for it:

How is your reading comprehension this bad?

1. Your understanding of the comment here is miserable given the point you are trying to make. If you should find anything suspicious, it is that the 2nd set of e-mails, with a broader search, included e-mails that should have been turned over previously but weren't. If you want to go down that angle, you think the Benghazi committee would sit on those e-mails and not say anything if there was anything particularly salient in them?

2. You have an issue that State is considering whether releasing POTUS e-mails are subject to executive privilege and should be cleared first?

3. Really? I'll parrot the guys that give out free comedy show tickets - "you don't like to laugh? you don't like humor?"

4. Please point me to the illegal or unethical behavior here.

[bduerst]

User gragas is copying and pasting the same post at this point - they're not interested in discussion as much as astroturfing at this point:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12715525

[danielahn]

Gotcha - thanks!

[shard972]

> 4. Please point me to the illegal or unethical behavior here.

Well to start, Qatar is funding ISIS according to other emails so maybe don't accept money from states that sponsor terrorism?

I mean we could go into how they stone gays for being themselves and women for having the gaul to think they can drive but we all know that's totally ethical.