|
|
|
|
|
by tinfoilman
3529 days ago
|
|
The UK is not going to stop, they are just going to make it legal thanks to the UK’s Investigatory Powers Bill. There is no opposition to it in the commons, minus SNP, LibDems I think our last chance to stop it is once again with the lords which I have little hope for, "wont they think of the children" https://www.opendemocracy.net/digitaliberties/julian-huppert... Direct quote “It is difficult to assess the extent to which the public is aware of agencies’ holding and exploiting in-house personal bulk datasets, including data on individuals of no intelligence interest …" They admitted in 2013 that the data collected is of "no intelligence interest". Anyone before snowden was called a nut job saying the government was doing this, it was all true Encrypt everything. This is going to force me to VPN to a VPS outside of the UK and route my house's http/https traffic via that, not hard but annoying. Sadly that will then put me on another list where all my traffic is recorded for later decryption. |
|
We can defend against a lot of communications surveillance by encrypting our communications, but these other data sources are still there and are mostly unaffected. (Note that this is also true outside of the UK.)
I don't know exactly how to address that. It seems like the main options are avoiding interacting with the institutions that create the records, persuading them to retain much less information about people, trying to get dramatically greater legal protection for other kinds of third-party records, or some kind of major cultural shift where institutions fear turning data over or governments fear requesting it.
Also, some datasets might exist partly because companies are legally required to retain certain records, so even if they didn't want to know that much about you, they may be mandated by law to have some of this information.