|
|
|
|
|
|
by jimmywanger
3536 days ago
|
|
|
> The person who has to carry the child to term gets the final say You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. You don't have to carry the child to term, at least in the states or most western countries. You choose to carry the child to term. > Don't. Screw. Have you spoken to teenagers or remember what that was like? They're still not fully formed human beings, under the influence of raging hormones. Don't expect old heads on young shoulders. |
|
|
>You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. You don't have to carry the child to term, at least in the states or most western countries. You choose to carry the child to term.
Either you misunderstood what I said, or you think that there is something to be gained from harping on semantics. Either way... no thanks.
>>Don't. Screw.
>Have you spoken to teenagers or remember what that was like? They're still not fully formed human beings, under the influence of raging hormones. Don't expect old heads on young shoulders.
Life isn't fair, and sometimes what you do as a teenager has long-term consequences, like having a child, or having to provide for a child. I have to say though, that in general this conversation does not seem to center around the impulsive choices of children, for the obvious reasons you've outlined. The usual way I see this issue framed is:
Condom broke. -or- "Conniving" woman poked a hole in the condom.
Neither implies reckless teenage abandon.