|
|
|
|
|
by mvdanj
3545 days ago
|
|
I don't agree with any of your statements, and I think they are inaccurate. jspm aims to be type-agnostic with respect to modules (supports all major types, hence why it is called a universal module loader). jspm certainly doesn't advocate rewriting your modules (you can use exports, AMD, ES6, whatever). In fact, when the browsers natively support module loading, systemJS will go away (which is really just a polyfill for this functionality). jspm also has npm compatibility. |
|