Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by open_bear 3536 days ago
> Zero doesn't sound like a reasonable expectation.

No it does. German documents clearly say "if they try to flee the city - shoot them". Hitler had specific plans to destroy it completely after the war.

> but not everyone was killed.

Out of 27 million deaths only 8 millions were combatants. Do the math on civilians.

> is whether a timely evacuation of Leningrad

Leningrad is a major industrial and cultural center, second city in the USSR, its loss would've dealt a colossal moral blow to the Soviet people. It also tied a lot of Nazi forces, that could've been used elsewhere (i.e. Stalingrad battle).

> Stalin intentionally left much of the civilian population in the siege.

No he didn't. Siege started in September, only 3 months after Nazis attacked. It is not possible to evacuate 3+ million city in such a short time. 659,000 were evacuated before the siege began, and 30,000 after. Many people didn't want to leave their homes.

> is used for silencing honest, civilized discussion about WW2 history.

No it is not.

2 comments

This doesn't look like the start of a useful debate, so I'll just say that Stalin prioritized military and ideological victory over sparing the civilian population of Leningrad. Other leaders in other countries made different choices.
They were censored for questioning national myths, not for whitewashing history.