[rimantas]

Why exclude faith? For PC sake?

[inimino]

Not many people change their foundational epistemic stance in response to mathematical arguments.

[eli_gottlieb]

It would help if fewer people had foundational epistemic stances. Fallibilism is much more realistic than foundationalism, as I understand the terms.

[M_Grey]

Faith isn't a logical process, from what I can tell, but it's also not a supposedly coherent system as most religions claim to be. Religions offer predictions (past and present), and supposedly consistent statements about morality and life, which are demonstrably inconsistent.