|
|
|
|
|
by bluejekyll
3549 days ago
|
|
I feel like this point is often made about C++: "in the future we will have that feature too!" If you don't want to wait, want to experiment with something else, learn a new language, etc., Rust is awesome. Obviously the counter argument to this is, "but there's 30+ years of C++ in production", but be honest, who actually wants to work on a 30 year old codebase? |
|
Why do I have to wait for every compiler on every system I want to build on to update to some future standard when things could be done now across the board in many cases?