|
|
|
|
|
|
by aeruder
3542 days ago
|
|
|
100% correct. Far too many misinterpretations of the LGPL out there seem to ignore the requirement that the LGPL'd portion must be able to be replaced/updated. I've seen way too many LGPL-licensed embedded-C libraries and VHDL libraries where it just does not make any sense. If your target platform doesn't have a dynamic linker, then LGPL is the same as GPL. There are some hacks where people distribute unlinked .o/.obj files. This is acceptable as well, but I don't see it too often. |
|
|