[Mango_Diesel]

This is not related to the implication made that she is an equivalent to the board at Theranos.

One one side you have people who are actively using their political influence to help a company avoid laws and regulations and operate an extremely careless, dangerous, fraudulent, etc. company in a very sensitive industry dealing with people's lives.

On the other side is a former politician who appears to be diversifying her experiences by being a member of the board of several venture-backed tech companies, one of which is a pretty decent way to share files.

The motivations and sinisterness of one of them stands in stark contrast to the other in the example made.