|
|
|
|
|
by berntb
3551 days ago
|
|
>> The claim of "Iran funding terrorism" is in fact due to its recent (as in decades) support of Sunni Hammas Uh, not only Hamas. There are lots of other cases. You even commented on where I gave this link to the terror stamped Quds force: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quds_Force I posted this link previously too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terro... And so on. (I have no clue about Islam in itself, but there were peaceful and modern Muslims in Yugoslavia. That is at least one modern example. It might also be noted that the upper classes in Iran seem to be about as West oriented as the Scots or the Irish.) |
|
I agree with that, I'm surely not the one who's considering Iran harmless. But I consider Saudis not less dangerous. It's just that the Saudis confront less directly with Israel and are "official" allies of the US.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/18/what-we-know-about-saudi...
Regarding the Muslims in the former Yugoslavia, I guess you refer to the Muslims currently in Bosnia and Herzegovina, then these "peaceful and modern Muslims" were by necessity "peaceful" during the peaceful periods there as they were a minority since 1878 when Austria got the control over Bosnia. Even in B&H they were under 50% until the last polls. So a lot of them simply grew up secular and didn't care about the Islam books, it's not that the Islam books were different. It seems that the leader of Muslims in the last war was actually advocating for the Islamic state ans Sharia there:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Declaration
And his government gave the passport to Osama bin Laden too, and brought the Islamic fighters just like in Afghanistan or Syria.