| > This is called "gaslighting" Incorrect. "Gaslighting or gas-lighting is a form of psychological abuse in which a victim is manipulated into doubting his or her own memory, perception, and sanity."
I don't believe that I have attempted to manipulate anyone into doubting their memory, perception, or sanity.> But rather than stand up for what you believe is a sensible use of the word, you wipe your hands the entire discussion. It's a childish tactic. I stand by what I said -- If the usage above is valid, then I can infer nothing useful based on the term 'racism'. To spell it out in full, recall the start of this thread, where someone was accused for racism because they named a policy that was in effect in 1914. _Note that the policy was not called racist. The only objection was the date. So, based on that usage above, one meaning of racist seems to be the following conjunction: 'Expressed approval for a policy' AND 'That policy was in place at a time when racism was a problem'
And given that racism has been a problem at any point in time, then the only conclusion that can be drawn is that someone had approved for some policy at some point in time.If this is a valid meaning for racism, then someone being called racist gives me no information about the person. I don't believe this is a useful meaning. |