[andrewprock]

I would expect AI to include some sort "emergent behavior", so in a sense you are correct. If a program does exactly what we expect it to, exactly how we tell it to, it almost certainly isn't AI.

Unless we are telling it to "be intelligent" whatever that means.

[witty_username]

> As machines become increasingly capable, facilities once thought to require intelligence are removed from the definition. For example, optical character recognition is no longer perceived as an exemplar of "artificial intelligence" having become a routine technology.[3] Capabilities currently classified as AI include successfully understanding human speech,[4] competing at a high level in strategic game systems (such as Chess and Go[5]), self-driving cars, and interpreting complex data.

(from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence)

[nerdponx]

This makes a lot of sense and has the added benefit of forcing us to reconsider what we mean by "intelligence."