|
|
|
|
|
by dnautics
3554 days ago
|
|
when you're at the bleeding edge, if you try to automate your way out of a solution, you will develop poor judgement. One of my grad student cohorts worked on a project where she automated large swaths of her project (which still required about 40-60h prep time). Early on during one of her group meetings, I urged her to take a closer look at her findings and not use automation for her work, but she didn't. I specifically warned her that "she might be chasing ghosts for years", and to not take my warning as any sort of judgment on her character. Later, she found that the thousands of observations she made were artefactual, a result of the automation kit she was using. Nonetheless I have a lot of respect for her for twisting the arm of her PI to allow her to publish the retraction report. Original report: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pro.363/full Retraction report: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pro.2339/full |
|