|
|
|
|
|
by bkjsbkjdnf
3552 days ago
|
|
> I mean, personally I feel a lot safer managing my own data privacy with what I give these companies, rather than having a government do it for me What a fallacious statement. How is government oversight of these companies going to prevent you from applying your own magical 'data privacy management' spells? |
|
That depends on what is being overseen by the government.
I have no issue with EU-style or Canadian-style privacy regs for PII. I think that encourages local innovation by ensuring data can stay within a legal geographical territory.
Where I take issue is "AI is scary, please stop these companies from doing things" and by implication thinking that a government (a) is an organization I trust more than the company with what should be done with my data (a massive leap), or (b) provides value by preventing/limiting that organization from offering a services I want based on AI because non-customers somehow think it's scary or might lead to some nebulous monopoly power.
I'm not saying no government oversight is every warranted ever, I'm saying that there's a lot of fear-based desire in this thread for "government save us from Zuck!!" which isn't helpful when people don't even know what specific regulation they're looking for and what the systemic consequences of that would be.