|
|
|
|
|
by Grishnakh
3553 days ago
|
|
>someone should go out there and try to set up a self-sustaining colony on the pole or in the middle of a desert. >That's already been done. It was called "Biosphere II", set up in the Arizona desert. It failed. >An experiment is only a failure if you don't learn anything from it. It was a failure. Go back and look at what I replied to: the OP said someone should go set up a self-sustaining colony. That was attempted with Biosphere II. It failed. It was not self-sustaining. It they learned stuff from it, that's all well and good, but it doesn't meet the requirement from the OP of being self-sustaining. The OP says we should set up a self-sustaining colony on Earth as practice for something in space. We have not done that. We tried and we failed, and we didn't bother trying again. So the point here is: what makes us think we can set up a self-sustaining colony on Mars when we can't even set one up in Arizona? Cart before the horse. |
|
But it can also be thought of as an experiment whose purpose was to test the hypothesis "this is a good way to set up a colony". In the scientific sense of the term, experiments that disprove their hypothesis are as successful as those that prove it. A failed experiment is one that is inconclusive or incomplete.