Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dnautics 3558 days ago
A acyclic graph is isomorphic to a tree, but the way you access the vertices and edges is completely different.
1 comments

Depends on your memory representation of the graph. If you simply use the obvious one (a node have a list of pointers to its successors), I don't see the difference except for successors[]/children[]
You're right. I mentioned acyclic graph and my mind slipped to general graphs. Although often graphs are represented as say a sparse matrix.