[PavlovsCat]

That's so impressive after having had a dictator installed and the coup against him being co-opted by Islamists. It's not like the US owes the Iranians held hostage by them anything, right? Especially considering how they really love Saudi-Arabia, while the US obviously wouldn't be caught dead supporting radical Islam with obscene amounts of money to fight the Russians or anything of that nature.

[tome]

Not quite sure what you're saying. The US supports Saudi Arabia in order to promote stability of a critically strategic area of the world. There's otherwise no love lost between the two powers. (Ironically, Iran under a secular government would be a far more preferable ally than Saudi Arabia)

[bogomipz]

"(Ironically, Iran under a secular government would be a far more preferable ally than Saudi Arabia)"

Why does it have to be secular as a prerequisite? Saudia Arabia is not only not secular but its not democratic either.

[tome]

It's not a prerequisite. It's just that a substantial proportion of the people of Iran are secular (unlike Saudia Arabia).

[bogomipz]

That's exactly my question why does it matter if their government is secular or not in order for the US to have it as a friend or ally?

[tome]

Unless you have a good reason otherwise, I'm inclined to believe that a secular government will be a more valuable ally than an Islamist one!