[fragmede]

"I will send DDOS for $xxx, send paypal to ###@example.com"

That's the the extremely unpopular speech that you're proposing to censor. The instant you say "oh but that's different" because of the contents of the speech, you're interjecting your own opinion about that speech.

Which, actually, is fine, but don't play that off as not being speech.

At the level where Cloudflare's network isn't actually being used to send the DDOS attack itself, it's also still speech.

Cloudflare will close accounts when asked, backed by court order. The problem is on today's Internet, that's nigh impossible, which realistically means it falls to Cloudflare to interject an opinion on what's good and bad, but so far they've avoided that as effectively as an ostrich burying it's head in the sand, and so are effectively supporting many bad actors.

[tripzilch]

While I understand your position, the particular line you quote is not protected as 'free speech' because it's advertising to sell a criminal act for money ... I could be wrong.