|
|
|
|
|
|
by more_original
3558 days ago
|
|
|
The quality of reviews is a general problem with the reviewing system. Just think about it: You're very busy with other work, you have many reviews to write, about papers that you're not probably really enthusiastic about, and reviews are anonymous to all but the editors. It shouldn't be surprising that this can result in rushed, bad reviews. It's also not too surprising that one can automatically generate a 'review' that looks like someone who forgot about the reviewing deadline and wrote something in a rush. Nevertheless, while bad reviews do make it through, I do think the editors are able to recognise them for what they are. |
|
|