[unfunco]

8 x $125K would be $1M, not the $2M that is currently being spent on employees.

Edit: Missed the first part of that, I apologise. 100% overhead doesn't seem reasonable per employee to me though.

[cjbprime]

You missed the "100% salary overhead" part of the sentence. Consider taxes, benefits, insurance, other non-salary costs to employing people.

[jimktrains2]

You missed the 100% overhead. Even 50% overhead at a slightly higher salary wouldn't be surprising.

[klinskyc]

it's (8125k) 2 since there is 100% overhead

[ddispaltro]

He said 100% overhead on top of salary