[Retr0spectrum]

Please use the data that you gather responsibly.

There are some people who abuse the system (who I hope you identify), and also some people who really should have the right to be forgotten.

As far as I can tell, using a US based VPN/proxy does not censor results - at least, it does not show the message.

Therefore, you just need to cross-reference the results from different geographic regions. However, it will be difficult to tell whether a certain result is missing due to censorship, or the fact that result rankings are slightly different for different countries.

Once you find a "suspicious" result, I guess you could try searching direct quotes from the article - If it doesn't show up in those results, then it's probably censored.

This process will need to be automated, if you want to check every name.

[matt4077]

> Once you find a "suspicious" result, I guess you could try searching direct quotes from the article

I believe google only removes the results from searches for the specific name. The page can still show up if you search for something else.

Other than that: +1 for your request for responsibility. I disagree with the court ruling, but having the right to publish some information doesn't always mean it's a good idea.

Google has details on a few specific requests. They include "high-ranking corrupt politician" (not removed) as well as "stalking victim's home address" (removed).