| Suppose that you're accused of a crime in North Korea and somehow you manage to escape the country. Will you still respect what you said in the comment and return to NK to stand trial ? Replace North Korea with Iran, Iraq, Syria or any other country known to be a corrupt or totalitarian state... Aka at least half of all the countries in the world... As a foreigner, you wouldn't trust the justice system in those countries and you would be right to try to avoid the trial. So you see, the validity of what you said depends a lot on the context. Even if the Swedish investigation and the trial is totally fair, it is not really the issue. The issue is the extradition treaty with the US - Sweden will have to make a choice - Assange or good relations with the U.S. And this is were the deadlock is. Go to Sweden and get unfairly convicted (low probability) or get extradited to the US and get life in prison (high probability). Or both. |
Should a Swedish court rule against extraditing Assange to the US, that will have exactly no impact on the relationship between the US and Sweden. No government can reasonably expect from another to break its own laws and it is certainly not in US interest for Sweden to go down that route. Not to mention that the US also reserves the right not to extradite to Sweden in individual cases.