|
|
|
|
|
by colordrops
3565 days ago
|
|
> Except for the many oversight channels that exists which there has yet to be any evidence he used. That is absolutely not true. There is plenty of evidence that he tried to report to several superiors. Read the accounts yourself. > None of this addresses the fact that it seems he did a recursive pull of supersecretnsadomain.gov and deuced out to China under the pretenses of whistleblowing. If he was looking to dump documents on china and russia for fun and profit, why exactly would he go through the rigamarole of working with the guardian, making an ethical issue out of it, spending tons of time meeting with various celebrities and dignitaries, doing talks, writing essays, and crafting a remarkably coherent and complex false narrative. That sounds about as far fetched as most things that get labeled conspiracy theories. He'd have to be one serious double agent to pull all that off. |
|