[nkassis]

On 3. I've found Aurelia templates to be much better in that regard. Their templates are valid HTML and compile well. I'm not a huge fan of embedding html within the JS (even with JSX) been easier to work with separate template files and keep as much JS out of them as possible. This has helped reduce harder to debug errors that crop up when the JS inside templates fails.

[stephenhuey]

I concur. Aurelia feels much more like the standard HTML that I've been working with since the 90s, only more powerful. Hence we get power without unnecessary complexity.