[eli_gottlieb]

This is one of the longest posts I've ever seen that managed to say almost nothing aside from dropping a few popular buzzwords.

>There are few who want to start from scratch and build up models. Many are ripping models from work done in the 60's,70's, and 80's without a second thought as to what was the thinking behind them. I chose an alternative path. It's paying off.

What does your "alternative path" have to say about visual categorization/object recognition? Do you have ImageNet results?

>You see a box. I see a relationship. There are no broad boxes over anything I am developing. The diagram was made in simple reduced form to help one conceive of the ties and flows to and from the world. People sing high praise of OpenAI and OpenAI gym. I experimented with similar open source packages when attempting to create a virtual environment for testing my code. I resolved on different packages and developed my own gym. I needed more access to the core/gut functions. From what I can tell, there are several other groups/companies/individuals that have done the same. No mention of them ever. No praise. Which is fine but it just goes to show you how there are likely numerous groups making headwinds in this area that no one has ever heard of.

Can your "alternative path" play Atari games? How about Nintendo games? Can it complete Link to the Past for the Super Nintendo, as I could at age seven?